A new funding solution is needed for  oil decommissioning

By Nicholas Newman

At the time of writing, we are seeing an increasing number of media reports detailing the huge numbers of abandoned oil wells in Alberta and Texas.  In addition, governments and the industry are experiencing growing concern over the increasing costs of decommissioning and reinstatement of both onshore and offshore oil and gas fields.

With oil prices at an unexpected all-time low, long- held assumptions about funding prospective decommissioning and reinstatement costs are proving unrealistic in meeting the requirements of many producers and regulators.  Public opinion and governments, in general, will no longer tolerate the abandoning of such installations by the energy industry, leaving the hard-pressed taxpayer with a problem running into billions of dollars to resolve.

In fact, as both the industry and governments turn their attention to these issues, it is becoming clear that this problem is increasing in scale as energy resources mature and become more expensive to operate.  In the current tough economic climate, there has been a rise in the number of wells abandoned or orphaned by operators.  At the last count, there were some 1,400 abandoned wells in Alberta[i] and more than 10,000 in Texas[ii].  Today, Alberta’s current abandoned well clean-up fund has only $240 million[iii] in the kitty whilst current estimates suggest that at least $29 billion[iv] is needed. A similar shortfall is being experienced by funded systems in other states, including Texas.

Expecting local regulators and taxpayers to foot bills amounting to billions of dollars to meet the costs of decommissioning is likely to prove unrealistic.

Tackling this problem

In the light of these decommissioning and reinstatement challenges that face not only the oil and gas producers but their regulators and governments, London-based Quatre Ltd has come up with a product and services package known as ESMS (Exit Strategy Management Solutions) which offers new funding and environmental liabilities solutions for decommissioning oil & gas assets.

The ESMS model addresses the decommissioning and reinstatement of on and offshore oil and gas fields and their associated post-decommissioning environmental liabilities whilst maximising economic recovery and protecting the public purse.

The key goal, in the early stages, is the protection of the Operators’ (Joint Venture partners) capital, by using a SPT (Special Purpose Trust.).  The SPT financial capacity is developed by annual contributions targeting a 3% annual Net Value Increase.  Contributions are based on the client company’s cash and cash-flow forecasts.

Special Purpose Trusts enjoy several advantages over traditional methods such as LOC (letters of Credit) or Security Bonds, all of which impose high annual maintenance fees.  In addition, the SPT is working on behalf of the client to deliver increased value and reduce, over a period, the total value of the annual contributions as the SPT builds capacity.  Once the funding is allocated to the SPT it is ring-fenced for decommissioning and reinstatement purposes only and protected against the prospects of insolvency.  Essentially, the SPT funds are used to pay for the decommissioning and reinstatement as well as for any other associated cost related to the decommissioning.

The second key goal is to ensure that environmental liabilities are transferred from the Operator post-decommissioning – allowing them to step away asset efficiently.  Quatre have developed long term insurance products that allow this to happen – even with the potential to include the regulator as an insured party in the event that the Operator were no longer viable when the liability was realized.

By protecting the public purse, Quatre’s ESMS gives government regulators and Treasuries greater confidence in the operator, whilst showing that the Joint Venture partners are addressing their environmental, economic and Corporate Social Responsibilities in a clear and transparent manner.  Adopting the Quatre ESMS model will, therefore, tackle many of the long-running decommissioning and reinstatement challenges, which are today facing both the operators of oil and gas fields and their governmental regulators.

[i] http://www.producer.com/2016/11/alberta-group-tackles-growth-in-abandoned-oil-wells/

[ii] http://bigstory.ap.org/article/dd3d234c031743e1988f13820a056b8c/oil-bust-leaves-states-massive-well-cleanup

[iii] https://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2016/11/04/Clean-Up-Plan-for-Alberta-Oil-Pollution/

[iv] https://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2016/11/04/Clean-Up-Plan-for-Alberta-Oil-Pollution/

One thought on “A new funding solution is needed for  oil decommissioning”

  1. “Contributions are based on the client company’s cash and cash-flow forecasts.”
    This is a funding model that has no relation to the “clean-up” and “de-commissioning” costs, basically, costs to remediate the harms to the environment from the extraction process. As such, it has nothing new to offer either the industry or the governments.
    There are any number of existing funding models that propose to clean up the mess afterwards. They, and this, are dismal failures.
    The only hope to fund the remediation of the environmental harms caused by a resource extraction corporation’s activities is to cost the site specific solution sets and collect that amount, or more, over the corporations operating lifetime. Anything else is just another Ponzi scheme.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Rating*